23 Comments
Oct 12, 2023Liked by The Sacred Heart Vortex

Thank you for the information. Great to see that there is a lotnof good chaps out there.

I'd urge you to avoid promoting Mike Yeadon, Mike Donio, David Crowe, Peter Duesberg and Kary Mullis. These people were/are gatekeepers that mix a lot a waffle with nothing that's really of worth but to each hiw own.

Keep up the good work 💪

Expand full comment
Nov 1, 2023Liked by The Sacred Heart Vortex

Great work you've done. This is the eagle perspective. How about this one? It's a physical perspective on the smallest scale. Please correct me If I am wrong.

Virologie says the average size of a covid unicorn bug is 100 nanometers or 0,1 mikrometers. The average size of a human cell is 25 mikrometers, that's 25.000 nanometers in size (they never talk about cubic meter size although they look for some sort of "spehers", that is odd, isn't it?)

This mean one human cell can contain the maximum of 250 viruses at a time, only IF the cell were empty and contained nothing else, which it isn't. Otherwise the expansion would destroy the cell.

Vorologie claims that viruses inside cells replicate by the millions and release millions of millions in one sneeze alone. But how can tens and hundereds of millions of virus particles fit into a cell at the same time, taken into account the volume and expansion? This should be visible with a simple microspe, above all with a EM. Instead, virology still needs to point and declare into a broth of gunk to make a few particles of unknown provenance recognizeable at all. At the same time some say that other cell components obstruct the view on viruses, that's why they are so hard to see.... Modern technology is allegedly able to measure on the nano size scale, like when it comes to so called graphene. Virologie claims knowledge about the density of viral particles. Expansion of such scale should be measureable.

Does this sound plausible?

Expand full comment

The most pointless argument occurring right now is terrain vs germ theories/Pasteur vs Béchamp.

It's a fools errand. They both believed micro organisms caused disease in an unhealthy body.

Terrain and germ theories are not mutually exclusive.

While I wanted to write an article on this subject, this article offers enough perspective: https://salvatorebattaglia.com.au/blog/171-terrain-or-germ-theory

Expand full comment
Jan 2Liked by The Sacred Heart Vortex

Indeed, the whole of Rockefeller's twin towers of lies - viruses and contagion - are being brought down with actual facts. Thank You for this amazing collection of sources!

I also wrote an article - more commentary than specific sourcing - on the fraud that Humanity has had perpetrated upon Us.

A Post to Be Viral (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/a-post-to-be-viral

Expand full comment

Really an excellent summary and very professional writing without any fuss!!! Thank you!!! It's refreshing to read a person with common sense and logical thinking again!!! I'll share this at my place!!

Perhaps also added, that every person reacts differently to these influences and especially older people, who are more likely to develop a new clinical picture due to existing illnesses and reduced cell division.

Expand full comment
Mar 16, 2023Liked by The Sacred Heart Vortex

Thanks for putting all this together - very complete and very useful resource.

In particular, I have been looking for months for that Italian researcher who has made remarkable claims about the so-called spike protein contained in the so called vaccines. And here he is:!

Stefan Scoglio - the off-guarding article is highly recommended - I plan to re-read and forward widely.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this, it's an amazing compilation! Really appreciate the time and effort it must have taken to get all this great information together and be so comprehensive.

Expand full comment

I still cannot balance this view of all illness being caused by these factors, with multiple people from different backgrounds catching the same illness at the same time, while only being in the same location very briefly.

Say catching Chickenpox, or measles, or a cold, along with other people in close proximity.

Expand full comment